Need help? We are here

  • +1 (304) 900-6229
Facebook Twitter Youtube
Place Order

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

RESOURCES

· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). 
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

· Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–228)

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. 

American Journal of Nursing
Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

· Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II. 

American Journal of Nursing
Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47-52

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence.

American Journal of NursingLinks to an external site.
, 110(11), 43-51. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

· Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. 

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationLinks to an external site.
, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733

·

Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

4.
NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Nursing leaders such as clinical directors

Respond to this post with a positive response : Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research. Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from

Developing an event budget

In this assignment you will assume the role of the planner of a video game launch event who is in the process of developing the event budget. As with any business venture a proper budget is required to determine the costs associated with a project as well as how income

Discussion 6: Jimmy Carter as a Case Study of Presidential

Discussion 6: Jimmy Carter as a Case Study of Presidential Failure? Jimmy Carter is generally identified as a relatively unsuccessful president  when it comes to domestic policy (in the foreign policy arena he had some significant successes, but also the Iran hostage crisis). How should we understand his struggles? Was

In 2014, Sony Pictures Entertainment had planned to release the

  In 2014, Sony Pictures Entertainment had planned to release the movie The Interview, a satire about a plot to assassinate the president of North Korea, Kim Jong-un. In the weeks before the release of the movie, Sony experienced several cyberattacks believed to be the work of hackers from North

Write an essay of at least 500 words discussing the

Write an essay of at least 500 words discussing the Safe Harbor provisions under HIPAA. Write in essay format not in outline, bulleted, numbered or other list format.   Use the five paragraph format. Each paragraph must have at least five sentences. Include 3 quotes with quotation marks and cited

Satisfaction with services provided

 You must go out into your community to complete the windshield survey! This project cannot be completed by just doing online research. For the paper, make sure interviews are cited as personal communication. (My community location is Dallas, TX, make sure to note this). An example of the paper is attached.

For this assignment you will write a two-page essay on

For this assignment you will write a two-page essay on a current technology issue. You may choose one of the technology issues from the list. Research your topic using a popular search engine or other resources. Print out at least three articles that you will use as sources for your

Situation Analysis for Under Armour company (needs to be supported

Situation Analysis for Under Armour company (needs to be supported by research and legitimate sources of information; cite all sources with proper APA format) Internal environment Description of the company, including current marketing strategies and performance Description of current and anticipated resources (e.g., financial, human, experience, relationships, patents, trademarks) Description

Develop a pamphlet to inform parents

To prepare for this assignment view the following brief video from the American Medical Association titled, “Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand.” The video can be accessed through the following link:   https://youtu.be/cGtTZ_vxjyA   Part I: Pamphlet   Develop a pamphlet to inform parents and caregivers about environmental

Research 1 IoT security breaches •the history of the attacks and

Research 1 IoT security breaches •the history of the attacks and affected devices •how they could have been prevented •Discuss any reputation loss or business loss by the company(s) of these hacks •Present the security outlook for the company.  Provide a 500 word (or 2 pages double spaced) minimum  

Discussion 1 Available until Jun 28, 2022 11:59 PM. Submission

Discussion 1   Available until Jun 28, 2022 11:59 PM. Submission restricted after availability ends. In this week’s discussion post, discuss the following: A woman at work tells you that her husband has just been diagnosed with early stage cancer.  She asks you if she should call hospice.  What do

BHA 427 HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT

In health care organizational charts, the vice president for finance, also called the chief financial officer (CFO), serves under the direction of the chief executive officer and is mainly responsible for overseeing financial planning and controlling the organization’s cash flow. Read the roundtable article Laying the Groundwork for Value-Based Payment

1.clean air act has done a lot of good to

1.clean air act has done a lot of good to help to clean the air and mainly to prevent the air pollution. Still we have many air problems issues which effect children and elderly. What do you think it should be done to make this Act more efficient? Does this

Discussion Topic Time series are particularly useful to track variables

   Discussion Topic Time series are particularly useful to track variables such as revenues, costs, and profits over time. Time series models help evaluate performance and make predictions. Consider the following and respond in a minimum of 175 words: Time      series decomposition seeks to separate the time series (Y) into

DELIVERED ORDERS
0
PROFESSIONAL WRITERS
0
CLIENTS ORDERED FROM US
0
Browse Solutions

Sitemap

Use Our 6 Free Tools

  1. Thesis statement generator
  2. Words to pages converter
  3. Words to Minutes Converter for Speech
  4. Free college GPA calculator
  5. Bibliography Generator
  6. Free Plagiarism Checker

We Accept:

Social Networks:

Facebook Twitter