Must include a turn it in report or will be forced to refund
As budgets and funding are essential to any emergency and emergency plan, students will have to locate funding sources and write a grant proposal for a grant they identify based on their research. The format for the grant proposal is included below. This writing assignment is worth 50 points and will be graded using the rubric below.
General guidelines for completion of the Grant Proposal.
The following elements should be included and used as the format for the written grant proposal:
· Cover Sheet
· Table of Contents
· Cover letter
· Statement of Need
· Goal, Objectives & Outcome
· Approach (Methods and Strategies)
·(Outlined Detailed Breakdown Cost)
· References
The grant proposal needs to be single-spaced and should be between 8 and 10 pages in length. The font needs to be Times New Roman 12 point font with 0.5-inch margins.
How to Write a Grant Proposal
See the following URL below, as well as the additional resources and such provided within the online course, on
to an external site.
This assignment requires a file upload submission. After you have reviewed the assignment instructions and rubric, as applicable, complete your submission by selecting the Submit Assignment button next to the assignment title. Browse for your file and remember to select the Submit Assignment button below the file to complete your submission. Review the confirmation annotation that presents after submission.
Essay RubricCriteriaRatingsPts
Synthesis of Knowledge
view longer description
15 to >12 pts
Exemplary
The paper thoroughly and cohesively links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the article.
12 to >8 pts
Accomplished
The paper cohesively links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis.
8 to >3 pts
Developing
The paper links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic but is lacking cohesiveness. Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment.
3 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper does not cohesively link concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment.
/ 15 pts
Foundation of Knowledge
view longer description
15 to >12 pts
Exemplary
The paper thoroughly incorporates appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis.
12 to >8 pts
Accomplished
The paper incorporates appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
8 to >3 pts
Developing
While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
3 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper does not incorporate appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
/ 15 pts
Organization of Ideas/Format
view longer description
10 to >7 pts
Exemplary
The paper thoroughly follows APA formatting and style guidelines. There is an introduction, logical body, and summary. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment.
7 to >4 pts
Accomplished
The paper follows APA formatting and style guidelines. There is an introduction, logical body, and summary. Thesis is defined and mostly well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment.
4 to >1 pts
Developing
The paper does not follow APA formatting and style guidelines. An introduction, logical body, and/or summary is lacking. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts.
1 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper does not follow APA formatting and style guidelines. Multiple aspects, such as introduction, logical body, and summary are lacking. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident.
/ 10 pts
Writing Skill / Research Skill
view longer description
10 to >7 pts
Exemplary
The paper is grammatically flawless and free of spelling errors. The paper is in the active voice. The student demonstrate an ability to excel at independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
7 to >4 pts
Accomplished
The paper is grammatically correct and free of spelling errors. The paper is in the active voice. The student demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
4 to >1 pts
Developing
The paper has grammatical and spelling errors. The paper is not in the active voice. The student does not demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
1 to >0 pts
Beginning
The paper is filled with grammatical and spelling errors. The paper is not in the active voice. The student does not demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
/ 10 pts
Total Points: 0
