IN YOUR OWN WORDS explain what the paper was about. What was the research question What hypotheses did the authors

IN YOUR OWN WORDS, explain what the paper was about.
What was the research question?
What hypotheses did the authors test?
How did they test their hypothesis (that is, what did they do?) and what were the results?
What do they think their results mean?
Be sure to focus only on the essential information—you can assume that I have read the paper and know the details.
QUESTIONS:
Did the authors convince you that their research question is important and that their hypotheses are meaningfully related to their research question? Why or why not?
Did they control for all the factors they needed to control for in order to plausiblymake their case? Can you think of other important controls they should have run?
Article evaluations should be no longer than 1 page, single-spaced

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

focuses on expanding on your Week 1 Assignment, with the

  focuses on expanding on your Week 1 Assignment, with the goal of helping you practice and develop literature review skills. Briefly explain the problem or question you are trying to address (from Assignment 1 and any feedback you received). Identify a set of keywords that might be useful in

This is a course reflection. This course covered the attached

This is a course reflection. This course covered the attached text book and answer in own words. No plagiarism at all.    How do you feel this course has improved your knowledge in management consultancy? Reflecting back on this course, what would you say has been the most beneficial? Reflecting back on

Merger Integration at Bank of America: The TrustWeb Project

Produce the following for this assignment: Presentation must contain (at a minimum) the following slides: Powerpoint presentation -Cover page -Agenda/Table of Contents -Summary slide of the case study -References page Slide(s) addressing each question below: -As a Project Manager what are the best ways to know the status of your

GROUP STAGES – Define each stage and what occur during each stage.

As a group you must attend an AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) Meeting and get literature for the group. While observing the group you must report on: 1) THE LEADER- what leadership qualities does the leader have? How do they command the room? Whate is their leadership style? How did the leader

Using the Rigor/Relevance Framework, identify the quad where the majority

Using the Rigor/Relevance Framework, identify the quad where the majority of digital learning tasks in your classroom, school, district or organization reside.  How might you begin to scale change to increase the level of thinking and application. The organizatoon is Episcopal Children’s Services. Some tech in this organization include Heggrety,

The purpose of the assignment is to develop skills associated

The purpose of the assignment is to develop skills associated with selecting and applying methods for data collection, qualitative data analysis, stationary and time series data analysis and hypothesis testing. Note: Part A and E are common to all Research Approaches. Use only the relevant parts to your research method

A very brief, synthesized summary of the important ideas discussed

A very brief, synthesized summary of the important ideas discussed in a selection of readings. A logically reasoned critique of the theoretical development, main argument or specific points being discussed, placed in context with at least ONE selected passage (and any additional outside source if used). 2 page assignment due

International Joint Ventures: The implications of the type of joint

International Joint Venture module Assingment. The assignment is based on In Module exercise.Where we can either collaborate with either one of the European based companies on the basis of most suitable offer The Question details is as follow Select one of the European Companies (EM or HC) featured in the

Critique the legal and ethical aspects of the Massachusetts Institute

Critique the legal and ethical aspects of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) analysis of the Aaron Swartz criminal case and subsequent suicide, which is outlined in one of this week’s readings.  As you do so, please be sure to address the application of this topic’s facts, relevant procedures (legal,

Legal systems affect corporate governance. 

Homework Set #3 Due Week 6 and worth 75 points Directions: Answer the following questions in a separate document. Explain how you reached the answer or show your work if a mathematical calculation is needed, or both. Submit your assignment using the assignment link above. MINI CASE Suppose you decide

Goal of community activism

Community activism is defined as actions through which organizations, groups and individual work together to promote economic, social, cultural policies and practice changes. Basically, the key goal of community activism is to endorse actions that decrease health disparities, improve living conditions and enhance community environments. Nowadays, advanced nurse practitioners engage

Your paper should be 8-10 pages 1.5 spaced. Longer papers

  Your paper should be 8-10 pages 1.5 spaced. Longer papers are also OK. There should be a short abstract, introduction where you explain what the topic is and the main questions to be addressed, the main analysis where you carry out the analysis, and conclusions or discussion (where you

How will you leverage knowledge to address challenges related to

   How will you leverage knowledge to address challenges related to young children and families that exist within your community, the early childhood field, and the world around you? How will you transform yourself as a scholar-practitioner so that you can move forward and impact positive social change? What actions

Question for Discussion #7 – God and Proof Compare the

 Question for Discussion #7 – God and Proof Compare the efforts made by Anselm and by Thomas Aquinas to argue for the existence of God. (Anselm’s proof is on p. 189, Aquinas’ on pp. 192-196.) In what ways are they similar and in what ways are they different? Both Anselm